Thursday, October 20, 2011

Cindi Santana



    One’s safety should not be jeopardized by others selfishness and lack of moral dishonesty. Protection should be an unspoken action of universality to keep us from corrupting our own morality. Not completing actions in a sense of universality leads the person to not have acted out of duty and good will which means there actions do not have a high moral standing.






In relation to the controversy over Cindi Santana’s death the principals and campus security should have protected miss Santana not only because of their job but also because of universality. Not using the idea of universality also put other students and staff in danger. Given the same situation those individuals would want protection against someone who was trying to harm them. Even though they cannot control the moral actions of Abraham Lopez Santana’s ex and her alleged murder they still have their own morals to uphold. Santana’s mother tried to keep her daughter safe satisfying her duty as a mother by informing the school of the situation, while Cindi took care of herself by informing the police of the threatening calls and actions Abraham was displaying. Hopefully, school systems will look at this situation and prevent another tragedy. Having the life of a young woman being taken shows that the actions of authority figures were impure shows that they do not have moral perfection and are not self-aware. 



No comments:

Post a Comment